Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Systematic Reviews

The Whats and Whys of Protocols

Systematic reviews and scoping reviews should have a protocol which helps to plan and outline the study methodology. The protocol should include:

  • the rationale for the review
  • key questions broken into PICO (or other structured research question) components
  • inclusion/exclusion criteria
  • literature searches for published/unpublished literature
  • data abstraction/data management
  • assessment of methodological quality/risk of bias of individual studies (not required for scoping reviews)
  • data synthesis
  • grading the evidence for each key question

Why should complete a protocol?

  • A protocol is your planning document and roadmap for the project. It allows you to complete a systematic review efficiently and accurately, ensures greater understanding among team members, and makes writing the manuscript far easier.
  • Many journals now require submitted systematic reviews to have registered protocols.
  • The PRISMA Reporting Standard lists information about the systematic review protocol as an "essential element" (PRISMA 2020 Item 24)
  • The Cochrane Handbook, The Institute of Medicine Standards, and others, all list completing a protocol as one of the important steps to a successful systematic review.

Writing a Protocol

Protocol templates:

Resources to help authors prepare a protocol for a systematic or scoping review:

Where to Register a Protocol

After you write the protocol, you should register it with a review registry. There are numerous review registries available, such as PROSPERO or OSF. Registration is free and open to anyone undertaking systematic reviews. Some journals also publish systematic review protocols.

OSF can be used to pre-register a systematic or scoping review protocol and to share documents such as a citation management library, search strategies, and data extraction forms. Unlike other registries, evidence synthesis author teams do not submit their protocols for review by an editorial board before they are accepted and pre-registered on OSF. Instead, create your own pre-registration.

Scoping reviews may not be registered with PROSPERO.  Currently, they can be registered with the Open Science Framework or Figshare.

Publishing a Protocol