There are many types of evidence synthesis projects, including systematic reviews as well as others. The review type selection is dependent on the research question, the research team's time and ability, and the parameters of the assignment or journal you are submitting to for publication,
Librarians can help your team determine which review type might be appropriate for your project, what databases to search, and how to manage your results.
Label | Description | Search |
Critical review |
Aims to demonstrate writer has extensively researched literature and critically evaluated its quality. Goes beyond mere description to include degree of analysis and conceptual innovation. Typically results in hypothesis or mode |
Seeks to identify most significant items in the field |
Literature review |
Generic term: published materials that provide examination of recent or current literature. Can cover wide range of subjects at various levels of completeness and comprehensiveness. May include research findings |
May or may not include comprehensive searching |
Mapping review/ systematic map |
Map out and categorize existing literature from which to commission further reviews and/or primary research by identifying gaps in research literature |
Completeness of searching determined by time/scope constraints |
Meta-analysis |
Technique that statistically combines the results of quantitative studies to provide a more precise effect of the results |
Aims for exhaustive, comprehensive searching. May use funnel plot to assess completeness |
Mixed studies review/mixed methods review |
Refers to any combination of methods where one significant component is a literature review (usually systematic). Within a review context it refers to a combination of review approaches for example combining quantitative with qualitative research or outcome with process studies |
Requires either very sensitive search to retrieve all studies or separately conceived quantitative and qualitative strategies |
Overview |
Generic term: summary of the [medical] literature that attempts to survey the literature and describe its characteristics |
May or may not include comprehensive searching (depends whether systematic overview or not) |
Qualitative systematic review/qualitative evidence synthesis |
Method for integrating or comparing the findings from qualitative studies. It looks for ‘themes’ or ‘constructs’ that lie in or across individual qualitative studies |
May employ selective or purposive sampling |
Rapid review |
Assessment of what is already known about a policy or practice issue, by using systematic review methods to search and critically appraise existing research |
Completeness of searching determined by time constraints |
Preliminary assessment of potential size and scope of available research literature. Aims to identify nature and extent of research evidence (usually including ongoing research) |
Completeness of searching determined by time/scope constraints. May include research in progress |
|
State-of-the-art review |
Tend to address more current matters in contrast to other combined retrospective and current approaches. May offer new perspectives |
Aims for comprehensive searching of current literature |
Seeks to systematically search for, appraise and synthesis research evidence, often adhering to guidelines on the conduct of a review |
Aims for exhaustive, comprehensive searching |
|
Systematic search and review |
Combines strengths of critical review with a comprehensive search process. Typically addresses broad questions to produce ‘best evidence synthesis’ |
Aims for exhaustive, comprehensive searching |
Systematized review |
Attempt to include elements of systematic review process while stopping short of systematic review. Typically conducted as postgraduate student assignment |
May or may not include comprehensive searching |
Umbrella review |
Specifically refers to review compiling evidence from multiple reviews into one accessible and usable document. Focuses on broad condition or problem for which there are competing interventions and highlights reviews that address these interventions and their results |
Identification of component reviews, but no search for primary studies |
Adapted from Grant, M. J. and Booth, A. (2009), A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26: 91-108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x